Plumb
C+

Personal finance

The College Investor

Independent (The College Investor, LLC; founded and owned by Robert Farrington)

Editorial reviews Free to read Visit The College Investor ↗

Useful explainers, with 'best' lists steered by affiliate commissions.

What it's really for A personal-finance blog whose rankings are steered by affiliate commissions.

What our grade covers The grade on this page is about its 'best of' brokerage, bank, and student-loan picks, not everything the site does.

High Scoring Confidence Checked against primary sources. We are confident in the facts and the grade here.

Follow the money

The brokers, banks, and lenders it ranks pay it the most via affiliate and lead-generation commissions, and while the site states partners "can never pay to guarantee favorable reviews," it openly sells "Sponsored Placements" and discloses on its rankings that it "receives compensation from companies whose offers appear on this site," which "may impact how, where, and in what order" products appear.

Source →
Operating since
2009 (17 years) · source
What it costs you
Free to read The reviews are free to read.
How they make money
It is an advertising-supported financial media site that earns affiliate and lead-generation commissions when readers sign up for the products it reviews, plus display ads, sponsored content, and podcast/video advertising.
What they do
It publishes personal-finance reviews and "best of" rankings (brokerages, banks, student-loan and budgeting tools) aimed at students, millennials, and people paying down debt.
What to watch for
It earns affiliate/lead commissions from many of the same brokers and banks it ranks, so its "best" lists steer you toward products that pay it, not necessarily the cheapest or best-fit option for you.
Composite score
2.70 / 5.00 → grade C+

How the grade was reached

Independence · 30% weight 1 / 5

Does the site take money from the very entities it ranks? Pay-for-placement, vendor-funded data, and affiliate commissions all pull this down. The less the ranking can be bought, the higher the score.

Evidence basis · 30% weight 3 / 5

What is the ranking actually built on? Hands-on testing scores highest, then verified first-hand reviews, then opinion or popularity surveys and self-reported figures, then pay-to-rank, which scores lowest.

Method transparency · 20% weight 4 / 5

Is the methodology published, specific, and reproducible? Can a reader see how a given rank was reached, or is it a black box?

Conflict disclosure · 10% weight 4 / 5

Are commercial relationships, sponsorships, and affiliate arrangements disclosed clearly and near the rankings themselves, rather than buried?

Manipulation resistance · 10% weight 3 / 5

How hard is it to game? Controls against fake reviews, solicited reviews, and vendor gaming raise this; an open box anyone can stuff lowers it.

Evidence

Compare with others

Others reviewing personal finance (compare all →)

Others reviewing education (compare all →)

← Back to the Report Card