Plumb
C+

Personal finance (bank/CD rate comparison)

DepositAccounts

LendingTree, LLC

Ratings & rankings Free to read Visit DepositAccounts ↗

Mostly honest rate tables, with a few paid 'featured' offers floated up top.

What it's really for A deposit-rate comparison site owned by LendingTree; mostly honest tables with a few paid features up top.

What our grade covers The grade on this page is about its bank deposit-rate tables and health grades, not everything the site does.

High Scoring Confidence Checked against primary sources. We are confident in the facts and the grade here.

Operating since
2005 (21 years) · source
What it costs you
Free to read The reviews are free to read.
How they make money
It is a free, ad-supported comparison site owned by lead-generation marketplace LendingTree, earning revenue from advertising and referral/lead-gen compensation on a small share of the bank and credit-union deposit offers it features.
What they do
It tracks and rates roughly 275,000 deposit rates across about 11,000-12,000 U.S. banks and credit unions, scoring savings, CD, money-market and checking products plus institution financial-health grades (A+ to F) so consumers can compare deposit accounts.
What to watch for
Most rates are unpaid and the ratings are formula-driven, but it is a LendingTree lead-gen property where a minority of offers are monetized and the parent disclosure says compensation can affect the order and which offers are "featured," so the top-of-page or highlighted picks are not always purely the best deal.
Composite score
2.90 / 5.00 → grade C+

How the grade was reached

Independence · 30% weight 2 / 5

Does the site take money from the very entities it ranks? Pay-for-placement, vendor-funded data, and affiliate commissions all pull this down. The less the ranking can be bought, the higher the score.

Evidence basis · 30% weight 3 / 5

What is the ranking actually built on? Hands-on testing scores highest, then verified first-hand reviews, then opinion or popularity surveys and self-reported figures, then pay-to-rank, which scores lowest.

Method transparency · 20% weight 4 / 5

Is the methodology published, specific, and reproducible? Can a reader see how a given rank was reached, or is it a black box?

Conflict disclosure · 10% weight 3 / 5

Are commercial relationships, sponsorships, and affiliate arrangements disclosed clearly and near the rankings themselves, rather than buried?

Manipulation resistance · 10% weight 3 / 5

How hard is it to game? Controls against fake reviews, solicited reviews, and vendor gaming raise this; an open box anyone can stuff lowers it.

Evidence

Compare with others

Others reviewing personal finance (compare all →)

← Back to the Report Card