Plumb
D+

Bank & Lending Product Reviews

MyBankTracker

QuinStreet, Inc.

Editorial reviews Free to read Visit MyBankTracker ↗

MyBankTracker's own disclosures confirm that advertiser compensation can influence product placement and ordering, and parent QuinStreet's core business is financial lead generation, making independence structurally impossible even where individual editorial opinions are genuine.

What it's really for Lead generation for QuinStreet's financial-services advertiser network, packaged as consumer-friendly editorial reviews and comparison tools

What our grade covers The grade on this page is about Editor reviews and star ratings of personal loan and mortgage lenders; best-of comparison guides for retail banking products, not everything the site does.

High Scoring Confidence Checked against primary sources. We are confident in the facts and the grade here.

Follow the money

MyBankTracker is owned by QuinStreet, Inc. (Nasdaq: QNST), whose business model is monetizing consumer intent via affiliate leads to financial institutions. MyBankTracker's own homepage states "many of the offers appearing on this site are from advertisers from which this website receives compensation for being listed here" and that compensation "may impact how and where products appear."

Source →
Operating since
2008 (18 years) · source
What it costs you
Free to read The reviews are free to read.
How they make money
Affiliate commissions from lenders and banks (per click, per approved application, per account opened); owned by QuinStreet, a digital performance-marketing company whose core business is lead generation for financial services advertisers.
What they do
Staff editors write lender and bank account reviews, assign star ratings, and publish "best of" comparison guides covering personal loans, mortgages, savings accounts, and other retail banking products. Readers also submit ratings.
What to watch for
Does not disclose a reproducible scoring methodology for how editor star ratings are calculated. Rankings and product ordering are explicitly influenced by affiliate compensation — the site's own disclosure states that advertisers paying for a listing may affect where and how products appear, so the "best" lists are not purely merit-based.
Composite score
1.80 / 5.00 → grade D+

How the grade was reached

Independence · 30% weight 1 / 5

Does the site take money from the very entities it ranks? Pay-for-placement, vendor-funded data, and affiliate commissions all pull this down. The less the ranking can be bought, the higher the score.

Evidence basis · 30% weight 2 / 5

What is the ranking actually built on? Hands-on testing scores highest, then verified first-hand reviews, then opinion or popularity surveys and self-reported figures, then pay-to-rank, which scores lowest.

Method transparency · 20% weight 2 / 5

Is the methodology published, specific, and reproducible? Can a reader see how a given rank was reached, or is it a black box?

Conflict disclosure · 10% weight 3 / 5

Are commercial relationships, sponsorships, and affiliate arrangements disclosed clearly and near the rankings themselves, rather than buried?

Manipulation resistance · 10% weight 2 / 5

How hard is it to game? Controls against fake reviews, solicited reviews, and vendor gaming raise this; an open box anyone can stuff lowers it.

Evidence

Compare with others

Others reviewing personal finance (compare all →)

← Back to the Report Card