Plumb
C-

Personal finance reviews

Investor Junkie

MPD Media (MoneyWise Media); investorjunkie.com now redirects to MoneyWise.com

Editorial reviews Free to read Visit Investor Junkie ↗

A 2009-era affiliate review blog now folded entirely into MoneyWise; by its own disclosure, the products it reviews are its paying sponsors, with editorial claiming the scoring stays separate.

What it's really for A personal-finance review blog paid affiliate and sponsored-content fees by the platforms it rates.

What our grade covers The grade on this page is about its scored investing-platform reviews, not everything the site does.

Medium Scoring Confidence Mostly sourced, but a detail or two still needs a primary source, so the grade could shift slightly.

Follow the money

Financial-product companies (brokerages, fintech apps, banks) pay the most via affiliate commissions and sponsorships; the site says linked products are from its sponsors but claims compensation does not drive its scores.

Source →
Operating since
2009 (17 years) · source
What it costs you
Free to read The reviews are free to read.
How they make money
Earns affiliate commissions and advertising/sponsored-content fees from the brokerages, fintech apps, and banks it reviews.
What they do
Published written reviews and rankings of investing platforms, robo-advisors, and personal-finance apps, each given an editorial score.
What to watch for
The brand is effectively retired: investorjunkie.com simply redirects to MoneyWise, and the reviews are desk-research editorial scores funded by affiliate deals with the same companies, not independent hands-on testing.
Composite score
1.90 / 5.00 → grade C-

How the grade was reached

Independence · 30% weight 1 / 5

Does the site take money from the very entities it ranks? Pay-for-placement, vendor-funded data, and affiliate commissions all pull this down. The less the ranking can be bought, the higher the score.

Evidence basis · 30% weight 2 / 5

What is the ranking actually built on? Hands-on testing scores highest, then verified first-hand reviews, then opinion or popularity surveys and self-reported figures, then pay-to-rank, which scores lowest.

Method transparency · 20% weight 3 / 5

Is the methodology published, specific, and reproducible? Can a reader see how a given rank was reached, or is it a black box?

Conflict disclosure · 10% weight 3 / 5

Are commercial relationships, sponsorships, and affiliate arrangements disclosed clearly and near the rankings themselves, rather than buried?

Manipulation resistance · 10% weight 1 / 5

How hard is it to game? Controls against fake reviews, solicited reviews, and vendor gaming raise this; an open box anyone can stuff lowers it.

Evidence

Compare with others

Others reviewing personal finance (compare all →)

Others reviewing crypto (compare all →)

← Back to the Report Card