Plumb
C+

Product comparison and review platform

Finder.com

Finder (hive.com Pty Ltd, founded Australia)

Editorial reviews Free to read Visit Finder.com ↗

Finder produces real editorial scoring via its Finder Score, but its own disclosures confirm that affiliate compensation can affect product ordering and placement — making table position an unreliable proxy for editorial rank.

What it's really for Drive monetizable traffic to lenders via comparison tables and "best of" lists; the editorial scoring gives credibility that supports clicks

What our grade covers The grade on this page is about US personal loan, auto loan, mortgage, student loan, and BNPL lender rankings and reviews, not everything the site does.

High Scoring Confidence Checked against primary sources. We are confident in the facts and the grade here.

Follow the money

Finder earns affiliate/click commissions, display ad revenue, and sponsored content fees from the lenders and financial providers it ranks. Its own "How We Make Money" page states compensation may affect product ordering and placement on the site.

Source →
Operating since
2006 (20 years) · source
What it costs you
Free to read The reviews are free to read.
How they make money
Affiliate commissions on clicks/applications, display advertising, and sponsored content sold to the lenders and providers featured in its comparison tables
What they do
Finder publishes "best of" ranked lists and individual lender reviews for personal loans, auto loans, mortgages, student loans, and BNPL across 130+ US providers. Products are scored via a proprietary "Finder Score" (0–10 scale) built from rate, fee, and feature data, and comparison tables are sortable with a "Promoted" label on paying partners.
What to watch for
Finder's own disclosure page states that compensation from partners "may affect how we order, position or place product information." The Finder Score may be editorially independent, but the comparison table placement and top-of-list positioning can be influenced by commercial relationships — meaning the best-ranked product for a reader and the highest-placed product in the table are not necessarily the same thing.
Composite score
2.70 / 5.00 → grade C+

How the grade was reached

Independence · 30% weight 2 / 5

Does the site take money from the very entities it ranks? Pay-for-placement, vendor-funded data, and affiliate commissions all pull this down. The less the ranking can be bought, the higher the score.

Evidence basis · 30% weight 3 / 5

What is the ranking actually built on? Hands-on testing scores highest, then verified first-hand reviews, then opinion or popularity surveys and self-reported figures, then pay-to-rank, which scores lowest.

Method transparency · 20% weight 3 / 5

Is the methodology published, specific, and reproducible? Can a reader see how a given rank was reached, or is it a black box?

Conflict disclosure · 10% weight 3 / 5

Are commercial relationships, sponsorships, and affiliate arrangements disclosed clearly and near the rankings themselves, rather than buried?

Manipulation resistance · 10% weight 3 / 5

How hard is it to game? Controls against fake reviews, solicited reviews, and vendor gaming raise this; an open box anyone can stuff lowers it.

Evidence

Compare with others

Others reviewing personal finance (compare all →)

← Back to the Report Card