Plumb
B-

Finance education & product reviews

Investopedia

IAC (People Inc., formerly Dotdash Meredith)

Editorial reviews Free to read Visit Investopedia ↗

Solid explainers, with a 'best brokers' list that doubles as its advertiser list.

What it's really for A finance-education site whose 'best' lists earn affiliate commissions from the products listed.

What our grade covers The grade on this page is about its 'best of' broker and robo-advisor rankings, not everything the site does.

Medium Scoring Confidence Mostly sourced, but a detail or two still needs a primary source, so the grade could shift slightly.

Follow the money

Investopedia's top advertisers are the very brokers it reviews and ranks (E*TRADE, Schwab, TD Ameritrade, Interactive Brokers, Betterment per its ad-partner profile), and its parent earns affiliate-commerce commissions when readers convert through those reviews, so the parties it rates are also its largest revenue sources, though it states advertisers do not influence its picks.

Source →
Operating since
1999 (27 years) · source
What it costs you
Free to read The reviews are free to read.
How they make money
It earns money from display/native advertising (sold on CPC/CPM/CPV) and from affiliate-commerce commissions paid when readers click through its reviews and open accounts or buy financial products, as part of parent Dotdash Meredith's performance-marketing revenue.
What they do
It publishes financial education articles plus "best of" rankings and reviews of brokers, robo-advisors, credit cards, and other financial products, scored against a published rubric.
What to watch for
You will not get a neutral shopping list: the brokers and financial products it ranks highest are also the companies that pay it ad and affiliate commissions, so treat the "best" picks as a starting point and compare fees and terms directly with the provider before signing up.
Composite score
3.20 / 5.00 → grade B-

How the grade was reached

Independence · 30% weight 2 / 5

Does the site take money from the very entities it ranks? Pay-for-placement, vendor-funded data, and affiliate commissions all pull this down. The less the ranking can be bought, the higher the score.

Evidence basis · 30% weight 4 / 5

What is the ranking actually built on? Hands-on testing scores highest, then verified first-hand reviews, then opinion or popularity surveys and self-reported figures, then pay-to-rank, which scores lowest.

Method transparency · 20% weight 4 / 5

Is the methodology published, specific, and reproducible? Can a reader see how a given rank was reached, or is it a black box?

Conflict disclosure · 10% weight 3 / 5

Are commercial relationships, sponsorships, and affiliate arrangements disclosed clearly and near the rankings themselves, rather than buried?

Manipulation resistance · 10% weight 3 / 5

How hard is it to game? Controls against fake reviews, solicited reviews, and vendor gaming raise this; an open box anyone can stuff lowers it.

Evidence

Compare with others

Others reviewing personal finance (compare all →)

← Back to the Report Card