Plumb
A-

Consumer tech & software reviews

PCMag

Ziff Davis, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZD)

Hands-on tester Free to read Visit PCMag ↗

Genuine lab tests up top, retailer-paid 'where to buy' links underneath.

What it's really for A consumer-tech publication with real test labs, monetized by affiliate links around the reviews.

What our grade covers The grade on this page is about its lab-tested reviews and 'Editors' Choice' awards, not everything the site does.

High Scoring Confidence Checked against primary sources. We are confident in the facts and the grade here.

Follow the money

PCMag's parent runs a roughly $1-billion-a-year affiliate-commerce operation in which Ziff Davis uses revenue-per-click data to decide which retailers earn link placement, negotiating how much rivals must pay to match Amazon's yield, so the merchants featured in shopping links are effectively those paying the most, even though that retailer-link layer is kept separate from the editorial review scores.

Source →
Operating since
1982 (44 years) · source
What it costs you
Free to read The reviews are free to read.
How they make money
It earns affiliate commissions when readers click product/retailer links, plus display and video advertising and B2B lead generation, all part of parent Ziff Davis's digital-media revenue.
What they do
It publishes hands-on reviews, ratings, "Editors' Choice" awards, and buying guides for consumer electronics and software, much of it backed by repeatable benchmark testing in its own NYC labs.
What to watch for
You get a genuine lab-tested verdict on the product, but the "where to buy" and best-deal links steer you toward whichever retailer pays the site the most per click, so the cheapest or best place to actually buy may not be the one shown.
Composite score
3.90 / 5.00 → grade A-

How the grade was reached

Independence · 30% weight 3 / 5

Does the site take money from the very entities it ranks? Pay-for-placement, vendor-funded data, and affiliate commissions all pull this down. The less the ranking can be bought, the higher the score.

Evidence basis · 30% weight 5 / 5

What is the ranking actually built on? Hands-on testing scores highest, then verified first-hand reviews, then opinion or popularity surveys and self-reported figures, then pay-to-rank, which scores lowest.

Method transparency · 20% weight 4 / 5

Is the methodology published, specific, and reproducible? Can a reader see how a given rank was reached, or is it a black box?

Conflict disclosure · 10% weight 3 / 5

Are commercial relationships, sponsorships, and affiliate arrangements disclosed clearly and near the rankings themselves, rather than buried?

Manipulation resistance · 10% weight 4 / 5

How hard is it to game? Controls against fake reviews, solicited reviews, and vendor gaming raise this; an open box anyone can stuff lowers it.

Evidence

Compare with others

Others reviewing consumer electronics (compare all →)

Others reviewing business software (compare all →)

← Back to the Report Card