Plumb
B-

web-services

WhoIsHostingThis.com

Not publicly disclosed (registrant masked via Domains By Proxy; no parent/owner named on the site)

Hands-on tester Free to read Visit WhoIsHostingThis.com ↗

Hands-on hosting reviews with a clear methodology and visible affiliate disclosure, but it earns commissions on many of the very providers it ranks.

What it's really for An affiliate-funded web-hosting review and comparison site with hands-on tests.

What our grade covers The grade on this page is about its hands-on 'best web hosting' rankings, not everything the site does.

Medium Scoring Confidence Mostly sourced, but a detail or two still needs a primary source, so the grade could shift slightly.

Follow the money

Revenue comes from affiliate referral commissions paid by hosting providers; the site discloses it earns fees on recommended services but states opinions are from "independent reviewers" and does not claim vendors can buy a higher ranking.

Source →
Operating since
2007 (19 years) · source
What it costs you
Free to read The reviews are free to read.
How they make money
An affiliate-funded review and comparison site that rates and ranks web hosting providers.
What they do
It signs up for hosting plans, runs hands-on tests across categories like speed, support, security and value, and publishes scored "best web hosting" rankings and individual reviews.
What to watch for
By its own disclosure, you should assume nearly every outbound link is an affiliate link, so the site earns a referral fee from many of the hosts it recommends.
Composite score
3.20 / 5.00 → grade B-

How the grade was reached

Independence · 30% weight 2 / 5

Does the site take money from the very entities it ranks? Pay-for-placement, vendor-funded data, and affiliate commissions all pull this down. The less the ranking can be bought, the higher the score.

Evidence basis · 30% weight 4 / 5

What is the ranking actually built on? Hands-on testing scores highest, then verified first-hand reviews, then opinion or popularity surveys and self-reported figures, then pay-to-rank, which scores lowest.

Method transparency · 20% weight 4 / 5

Is the methodology published, specific, and reproducible? Can a reader see how a given rank was reached, or is it a black box?

Conflict disclosure · 10% weight 4 / 5

Are commercial relationships, sponsorships, and affiliate arrangements disclosed clearly and near the rankings themselves, rather than buried?

Manipulation resistance · 10% weight 2 / 5

How hard is it to game? Controls against fake reviews, solicited reviews, and vendor gaming raise this; an open box anyone can stuff lowers it.

Evidence

Compare with others

Others reviewing vpns, hosting & security (compare all →)

← Back to the Report Card