Plumb
B-

consumer-electronics

ConsumerSearch

People Inc. (formerly Dotdash Meredith / IAC's About.com group)

Score aggregator Free to read Visit ConsumerSearch ↗

A pioneering "review of the reviews" aggregator that ranked products by reading other experts' tests rather than running its own, and now appears effectively shuttered as its parent's Ask.com sister site has closed.

What it's really for A meta-aggregator (now closed) that graded and summarized existing expert and user reviews.

What our grade covers The grade on this page is about its 'best reviewed' picks distilled from other reviews, not everything the site does.

Medium Scoring Confidence Mostly sourced, but a detail or two still needs a primary source, so the grade could shift slightly.

Operating since
1999 (27 years) · source
What it costs you
Free to read The reviews are free to read.
How they make money
A meta-aggregator that scored products by reading, weighting, and summarizing existing expert and user reviews from sources like Consumer Reports, magazines, and Amazon, monetized through affiliate "where to buy" links.
What they do
It combed through professional and user reviews across the web, graded each source by credibility, expertise, and relevance, and distilled them into "best reviewed" product picks and buying guides.
What to watch for
By its own description it did no hands-on product testing of its own, so its rankings were only as good as the third-party reviews it summarized, and it earned affiliate commissions on the purchases it recommended.
Composite score
2.90 / 5.00 → grade B-

How the grade was reached

Independence · 30% weight 3 / 5

Does the site take money from the very entities it ranks? Pay-for-placement, vendor-funded data, and affiliate commissions all pull this down. The less the ranking can be bought, the higher the score.

Evidence basis · 30% weight 3 / 5

What is the ranking actually built on? Hands-on testing scores highest, then verified first-hand reviews, then opinion or popularity surveys and self-reported figures, then pay-to-rank, which scores lowest.

Method transparency · 20% weight 3 / 5

Is the methodology published, specific, and reproducible? Can a reader see how a given rank was reached, or is it a black box?

Conflict disclosure · 10% weight 2 / 5

Are commercial relationships, sponsorships, and affiliate arrangements disclosed clearly and near the rankings themselves, rather than buried?

Manipulation resistance · 10% weight 3 / 5

How hard is it to game? Controls against fake reviews, solicited reviews, and vendor gaming raise this; an open box anyone can stuff lowers it.

Evidence

Compare with others

Others reviewing consumer electronics (compare all →)

← Back to the Report Card