Plumb
A+

Consumer electronics reviews

Notebookcheck

Notebookcheck Publishing GmbH (Vienna, Austria)

Hands-on tester Free to read Visit Notebookcheck ↗

A lab-driven laptop and gadget reviewer that publishes its own measurements and method; it earns affiliate commissions and ad revenue, but rankings come from in-house testing, not paid placement.

What it's really for A device-testing site measuring display, battery, and thermals; ad and affiliate funded.

What our grade covers The grade on this page is about its lab-tested laptop and phone reviews, not everything the site does.

High Scoring Confidence Checked against primary sources. We are confident in the facts and the grade here.

Follow the money

Advertisers and retailers fund it most through display ads and affiliate commissions, and by its own disclosure those affiliate links earn it a cut of sales but are not stated to buy ranking or placement in reviews.

Source →
Operating since
2005 (21 years) · source
What it costs you
Free to read The reviews are free to read.
How they make money
It makes money through display advertising and affiliate commissions when readers buy through its links, plus some sponsored content.
What they do
It runs hands-on, in-house lab tests (display, battery, thermals, noise, performance benchmarks) on laptops, phones and tablets and publishes scored, comparable reviews.
What to watch for
It earns affiliate commissions on the products it reviews, so by its own disclosure there is a commercial incentive tied to reader purchases, even though scores come from its own lab measurements.
Composite score
4.60 / 5.00 → grade A+

How the grade was reached

Independence · 30% weight 4 / 5

Does the site take money from the very entities it ranks? Pay-for-placement, vendor-funded data, and affiliate commissions all pull this down. The less the ranking can be bought, the higher the score.

Evidence basis · 30% weight 5 / 5

What is the ranking actually built on? Hands-on testing scores highest, then verified first-hand reviews, then opinion or popularity surveys and self-reported figures, then pay-to-rank, which scores lowest.

Method transparency · 20% weight 5 / 5

Is the methodology published, specific, and reproducible? Can a reader see how a given rank was reached, or is it a black box?

Conflict disclosure · 10% weight 4 / 5

Are commercial relationships, sponsorships, and affiliate arrangements disclosed clearly and near the rankings themselves, rather than buried?

Manipulation resistance · 10% weight 5 / 5

How hard is it to game? Controls against fake reviews, solicited reviews, and vendor gaming raise this; an open box anyone can stuff lowers it.

Evidence

Compare with others

Others reviewing consumer electronics (compare all →)

← Back to the Report Card