Plumb
B

Video game reviews & media

GameSpot

Fandom, Inc.

Editorial reviews Free to read Visit GameSpot ↗

Hands-on staff reviews on a transparent 10-point scale, but it's an ad- and affiliate-funded outlet, and its independence was famously tested by the 2007 Gerstmann firing, which Gerstmann later said stemmed from advertiser pressure.

What it's really for A video-game outlet; staff reviews monetized by ads and affiliate buy links.

What our grade covers The grade on this page is about its hands-on game reviews scored on 10, not everything the site does.

High Scoring Confidence Checked against primary sources. We are confident in the facts and the grade here.

Follow the money

Game publishers and advertisers fund the site most through advertising, and GameSpot also earns affiliate commissions on game purchases, but those payments buy ads and links, not review scores or ranking placement.

Source →
Operating since
1996 (30 years) · source
What it costs you
Free to read The reviews are free to read.
How they make money
It makes money from advertising and from affiliate commissions when readers buy games through its links; it does not charge the publishers it reviews for scores.
What they do
GameSpot publishes first-hand, hands-on reviews of video games (plus film and TV) written by staff critics and scored on a 10-point scale after internal peer review.
What to watch for
Scores are individual critics' opinions rather than reproducible test measurements, and the site earns affiliate revenue on the same games it reviews, so by its own disclosure commercial and editorial interests sit close together.
Composite score
3.30 / 5.00 → grade B

How the grade was reached

Independence · 30% weight 2 / 5

Does the site take money from the very entities it ranks? Pay-for-placement, vendor-funded data, and affiliate commissions all pull this down. The less the ranking can be bought, the higher the score.

Evidence basis · 30% weight 4 / 5

What is the ranking actually built on? Hands-on testing scores highest, then verified first-hand reviews, then opinion or popularity surveys and self-reported figures, then pay-to-rank, which scores lowest.

Method transparency · 20% weight 4 / 5

Is the methodology published, specific, and reproducible? Can a reader see how a given rank was reached, or is it a black box?

Conflict disclosure · 10% weight 3 / 5

Are commercial relationships, sponsorships, and affiliate arrangements disclosed clearly and near the rankings themselves, rather than buried?

Manipulation resistance · 10% weight 4 / 5

How hard is it to game? Controls against fake reviews, solicited reviews, and vendor gaming raise this; an open box anyone can stuff lowers it.

Evidence

Compare with others

Others reviewing media & entertainment (compare all →)

Others reviewing consumer electronics (compare all →)

← Back to the Report Card