Plumb
B

Auto reviews and awards

MotorTrend

Hearst Communications (Hearst Magazines)

Hands-on tester Free to read Visit MotorTrend ↗

Real instrumented testing and a published award process, but it is ad-supported by the same automakers it reviews, which critics say creates a conflict of interest.

What it's really for A car magazine with real instrumented testing, funded by ads and affiliate links.

What our grade covers The grade on this page is about its instrumented road tests and 'of the Year' awards, not everything the site does.

High Scoring Confidence Checked against primary sources. We are confident in the facts and the grade here.

Follow the money

Automakers are the largest source of revenue through advertising, and while MotorTrend frames its awards as editorial, watchdog Checkbook.org argues such ad-funded auto awards carry an inherent conflict of interest.

Source →
Operating since
1949 (77 years) · source
What it costs you
Free to read The reviews are free to read.
How they make money
It makes money from advertising (display, native, and sponsored content), magazine subscriptions, and affiliate commissions on its buyer's guide.
What they do
MotorTrend road-tests and instrument-tests new vehicles, publishes ratings and buyer's guides, and runs the long-running Car/Truck/SUV of the Year awards.
What to watch for
Its scores rest on editors' expert judgment against six criteria rather than a fully reproducible point formula, and the brand carries heavy advertising from the automakers it covers.
Composite score
3.30 / 5.00 → grade B

How the grade was reached

Independence · 30% weight 2 / 5

Does the site take money from the very entities it ranks? Pay-for-placement, vendor-funded data, and affiliate commissions all pull this down. The less the ranking can be bought, the higher the score.

Evidence basis · 30% weight 5 / 5

What is the ranking actually built on? Hands-on testing scores highest, then verified first-hand reviews, then opinion or popularity surveys and self-reported figures, then pay-to-rank, which scores lowest.

Method transparency · 20% weight 3 / 5

Is the methodology published, specific, and reproducible? Can a reader see how a given rank was reached, or is it a black box?

Conflict disclosure · 10% weight 2 / 5

Are commercial relationships, sponsorships, and affiliate arrangements disclosed clearly and near the rankings themselves, rather than buried?

Manipulation resistance · 10% weight 4 / 5

How hard is it to game? Controls against fake reviews, solicited reviews, and vendor gaming raise this; an open box anyone can stuff lowers it.

Evidence

Compare with others

Others reviewing autos (compare all →)

Others reviewing media & entertainment (compare all →)

← Back to the Report Card