Plumb
C-

Local pro "best of" lists (lead-gen directory)

Expertise.com

Forbes Digital Marketing, Inc. (Forbes Marketplace / Forbes Advisor); operating entity Expertise LLC, Encino, CA

Directory / lead-gen Free to read Visit Expertise.com ↗

A tidy 'best local pro' badge that its own contract says you can pay to wear.

What it's really for A local-pro lead-gen directory; ranked providers pay a monthly fee to be featured.

What our grade covers The grade on this page is about its 'best [pro] in [city]' lists, not everything the site does.

High Scoring Confidence Checked against primary sources. We are confident in the facts and the grade here.

Follow the money

The parties it ranks are exactly who pays it the most: Expertise.com's own Marketing Agreement says a listed provider "shall pay SP the amount agreed to per the Expertise.com invoice in exchange for placement in the corresponding category" (monthly, 90-day initial term), and its Terms admit these paid "Featured/Sponsored" ads "will appear above, or otherwise prioritized over, any organic search results."

Source →
Operating since
2015 (11 years) · source
What it costs you
Free to read The reviews are free to read.
How they make money
It makes money from advertising and lead generation: ranked providers pay monthly for "Featured"/"Sponsored" placement and paid lead delivery, plus affiliate/referral commissions.
What they do
It publishes algorithmically generated "best [profession] in [city]" lists across 200+ categories (including accountants and lawyers), scored from public data, reviews, and license records.
What to watch for
The businesses shown at the top may be paying for that spot: the site sells "Featured" and "Sponsored" placements that sit above its supposedly merit-based picks, so a top listing is not proof a pro is actually the best near you.
Composite score
2.00 / 5.00 → grade C-

How the grade was reached

Independence · 30% weight 1 / 5

Does the site take money from the very entities it ranks? Pay-for-placement, vendor-funded data, and affiliate commissions all pull this down. The less the ranking can be bought, the higher the score.

Evidence basis · 30% weight 2 / 5

What is the ranking actually built on? Hands-on testing scores highest, then verified first-hand reviews, then opinion or popularity surveys and self-reported figures, then pay-to-rank, which scores lowest.

Method transparency · 20% weight 3 / 5

Is the methodology published, specific, and reproducible? Can a reader see how a given rank was reached, or is it a black box?

Conflict disclosure · 10% weight 3 / 5

Are commercial relationships, sponsorships, and affiliate arrangements disclosed clearly and near the rankings themselves, rather than buried?

Manipulation resistance · 10% weight 2 / 5

How hard is it to game? Controls against fake reviews, solicited reviews, and vendor gaming raise this; an open box anyone can stuff lowers it.

Evidence

Compare with others

Others reviewing local & home services (compare all →)

Others reviewing professional services (compare all →)

Others reviewing accounting & tax firms (compare all →)

← Back to the Report Card