Plumb
D

Doctor ratings / provider directory

Vitals

Internet Brands (via WebMD; acquired the Vitals consumer division from MDx Medical in 2018)

Directory / lead-gen Free to read Visit Vitals ↗

Anonymous, email-only doctor ratings, easy to pad, with paid top spots.

What it's really for A doctor-finder directory; the ratings are easy to pad and the top spots are paid.

What our grade covers The grade on this page is about its patient star ratings and doctor listings, not everything the site does.

High Scoring Confidence Checked against primary sources. We are confident in the facts and the grade here.

Follow the money

The parties paying most are the listed doctors themselves: practices can buy a "sponsored" top spot above the organic results (Vitals markets a claimed 7.5x patient-conversion boost) plus featured listings and other paid profile upgrades, so paying directly buys higher placement/visibility.

Source →
Operating since
2007 (19 years) · source
What it costs you
Free to read The reviews are free to read.
How they make money
It makes money by selling advertising, sponsored top-of-search placement, and enhanced/featured profiles (plus online-booking and call-tracking add-ons) to the same doctors and practices it lists and rates.
What they do
Vitals is a consumer doctor-finder directory that publishes star ratings and patient reviews of physicians so people can pick a provider.
What to watch for
The star ratings come from anonymous, email-only patient submissions with no account or verified identity required, so they are easy to solicit or pad and shouldn't be treated as a reliable measure of clinical quality.
Composite score
1.60 / 5.00 → grade D

How the grade was reached

Independence · 30% weight 1 / 5

Does the site take money from the very entities it ranks? Pay-for-placement, vendor-funded data, and affiliate commissions all pull this down. The less the ranking can be bought, the higher the score.

Evidence basis · 30% weight 2 / 5

What is the ranking actually built on? Hands-on testing scores highest, then verified first-hand reviews, then opinion or popularity surveys and self-reported figures, then pay-to-rank, which scores lowest.

Method transparency · 20% weight 2 / 5

Is the methodology published, specific, and reproducible? Can a reader see how a given rank was reached, or is it a black box?

Conflict disclosure · 10% weight 2 / 5

Are commercial relationships, sponsorships, and affiliate arrangements disclosed clearly and near the rankings themselves, rather than buried?

Manipulation resistance · 10% weight 1 / 5

How hard is it to game? Controls against fake reviews, solicited reviews, and vendor gaming raise this; an open box anyone can stuff lowers it.

Evidence

Compare with others

Others reviewing professional services (compare all →)

← Back to the Report Card