Plumb
F

Lawyer directory

FindLaw

Internet Brands (MH Sub I, LLC); formerly Thomson Reuters (2001–2024)

Directory / lead-gen Free to read Visit FindLaw ↗

The lawyers up top paid to be there; the order is advertising, not a ranking.

What it's really for A consumer lawyer directory; the attorneys shown paid for placement, so it's advertising, not a ranking.

What our grade covers The grade on this page is about its lawyer directory listings, not everything the site does.

High Scoring Confidence Checked against primary sources. We are confident in the facts and the grade here.

Follow the money

Listed attorneys pay FindLaw, and paying buys higher placement: its Spotlight Listing openly "secures a spot at the top" so a firm is "one of the first listings people see," while free profiles get only a "Standard Listing" versus the "Enhanced Visibility" and "Prioritized + Promoted" reviews of paid tiers.

Source →
Operating since
1995 (31 years) · source
What it costs you
Free to read The reviews are free to read.
How they make money
It sells attorneys paid directory listings, premium/Spotlight placement, and bundled website/SEO/PPC marketing packages, so revenue comes from the lawyers it lists rather than the consumers who search.
What they do
FindLaw runs a consumer-facing lawyer directory (plus legal articles and DIY legal tools) where people search for attorneys by location and practice area.
What to watch for
The lawyers shown at the top are largely the ones paying for placement, not the most qualified or best-reviewed, so the ordering you see is advertising, not a neutral ranking.
Composite score
0.90 / 5.00 → grade F

How the grade was reached

Independence · 30% weight 0 / 5

Does the site take money from the very entities it ranks? Pay-for-placement, vendor-funded data, and affiliate commissions all pull this down. The less the ranking can be bought, the higher the score.

Evidence basis · 30% weight 1 / 5

What is the ranking actually built on? Hands-on testing scores highest, then verified first-hand reviews, then opinion or popularity surveys and self-reported figures, then pay-to-rank, which scores lowest.

Method transparency · 20% weight 2 / 5

Is the methodology published, specific, and reproducible? Can a reader see how a given rank was reached, or is it a black box?

Conflict disclosure · 10% weight 1 / 5

Are commercial relationships, sponsorships, and affiliate arrangements disclosed clearly and near the rankings themselves, rather than buried?

Manipulation resistance · 10% weight 1 / 5

How hard is it to game? Controls against fake reviews, solicited reviews, and vendor gaming raise this; an open box anyone can stuff lowers it.

Evidence

Compare with others

Others reviewing professional services (compare all →)

← Back to the Report Card