Plumb
C-

Professional services (legal directory)

Lawyers.com

Internet Brands (Martindale-Avvo legal division; majority-owned by KKR)

Directory / lead-gen Free to read Visit Lawyers.com ↗

A lawyer directory whose star ratings sit beside paid "Preferred Placement" sold to the very attorneys it lists, so high visibility can reflect ad spend as much as merit.

What it's really for A lawyer directory; attorneys pay for profiles and 'Preferred Placement' advertising.

What our grade covers The grade on this page is about its attorney listings and peer ratings, not everything the site does.

High Scoring Confidence Checked against primary sources. We are confident in the facts and the grade here.

Follow the money

Attorneys and law firms pay the most, through monthly listing fees (around $277/mo in one cited example) and Preferred Placement that, by the platform's own ad model, puts paying lawyers at the top of relevant listing pages.

Source →
Operating since
1998 (28 years) · source
What it costs you
Free to read The reviews are free to read.
How they make money
It makes money selling attorneys subscription profiles and paid "Preferred Placement" advertising across the Martindale-Avvo network, plus lead generation.
What they do
It lists attorneys with profiles, Martindale-Hubbell peer-review ratings (such as AV Preeminent) and client reviews so consumers can search and compare lawyers by location and practice area.
What to watch for
The peer ratings reflect surveyed lawyers' opinions of one another rather than hands-on testing, and the top spots in a listing can be bought through paid Preferred Placement, so position is not a pure merit ranking.
Composite score
1.90 / 5.00 → grade C-

How the grade was reached

Independence · 30% weight 1 / 5

Does the site take money from the very entities it ranks? Pay-for-placement, vendor-funded data, and affiliate commissions all pull this down. The less the ranking can be bought, the higher the score.

Evidence basis · 30% weight 2 / 5

What is the ranking actually built on? Hands-on testing scores highest, then verified first-hand reviews, then opinion or popularity surveys and self-reported figures, then pay-to-rank, which scores lowest.

Method transparency · 20% weight 3 / 5

Is the methodology published, specific, and reproducible? Can a reader see how a given rank was reached, or is it a black box?

Conflict disclosure · 10% weight 2 / 5

Are commercial relationships, sponsorships, and affiliate arrangements disclosed clearly and near the rankings themselves, rather than buried?

Manipulation resistance · 10% weight 2 / 5

How hard is it to game? Controls against fake reviews, solicited reviews, and vendor gaming raise this; an open box anyone can stuff lowers it.

Evidence

Compare with others

Others reviewing professional services (compare all →)

← Back to the Report Card