Plumb
C

Legal directory & attorney ratings

Justia

Justia, Inc. (privately held; independent, founder-owned — no parent company)

Directory / lead-gen Free to read Visit Justia ↗

Free case law plus a lawyer directory where attorneys pay for top placement, sitting alongside a separate peer-only rating Justia says it does not sell.

What it's really for A free legal-research portal; law firms pay for premium directory placement and marketing.

What our grade covers The grade on this page is about its lawyer directory and 1-10 peer ratings, not everything the site does.

High Scoring Confidence Checked against primary sources. We are confident in the facts and the grade here.

Follow the money

Law firms are the paying customers, and by Justia's own description paying does buy higher placement in the directory (Platinum is one exclusive slot per practice-area/metro shown above organic results), though the separate peer rating is not sold.

Source →
Operating since
2003 (23 years) · source
What it costs you
Free to read The reviews are free to read.
How they make money
Justia gives away legal information and earns money selling law firms marketing services: premium directory placements, websites, and PPC/SEO management.
What they do
It runs a free legal-research portal and a lawyer directory whose profiles carry a 1-10 attorney-to-attorney peer rating, while selling enhanced placement and marketing to law firms.
What to watch for
By Justia's own marketing, paid Premium, Gold, and Platinum placements appear above the organic directory listings, and the cost of those placements is quote-only rather than published.
Composite score
2.30 / 5.00 → grade C

How the grade was reached

Independence · 30% weight 1 / 5

Does the site take money from the very entities it ranks? Pay-for-placement, vendor-funded data, and affiliate commissions all pull this down. The less the ranking can be bought, the higher the score.

Evidence basis · 30% weight 3 / 5

What is the ranking actually built on? Hands-on testing scores highest, then verified first-hand reviews, then opinion or popularity surveys and self-reported figures, then pay-to-rank, which scores lowest.

Method transparency · 20% weight 3 / 5

Is the methodology published, specific, and reproducible? Can a reader see how a given rank was reached, or is it a black box?

Conflict disclosure · 10% weight 2 / 5

Are commercial relationships, sponsorships, and affiliate arrangements disclosed clearly and near the rankings themselves, rather than buried?

Manipulation resistance · 10% weight 3 / 5

How hard is it to game? Controls against fake reviews, solicited reviews, and vendor gaming raise this; an open box anyone can stuff lowers it.

Evidence

Compare with others

Others reviewing professional services (compare all →)

← Back to the Report Card