Plumb
D

Local home-services lead-gen / directory

HomeAdvisor

Angi Inc. (majority-owned by IAC Inc.)

Directory / lead-gen Free to read Visit HomeAdvisor ↗

Your details sold to several contractors at once; visibility goes to whoever pays per lead.

What it's really for A home-services lead-gen marketplace; your details are sold to the contractors who paid to receive them.

What our grade covers The grade on this page is about its contractor matches, ratings, and badges, not everything the site does.

High Scoring Confidence Checked against primary sources. We are confident in the facts and the grade here.

Follow the money

Revenue comes entirely from the contractors being listed and matched: pros pay for each lead, so visibility on the platform is a direct function of paying for leads rather than independent merit, and the FTC charged that HomeAdvisor even sold pros leads that did not match their services or that came from consumers not ready to hire.

Source →
Operating since
1998 (28 years) · source
What it costs you
Free to read The reviews are free to read.
How they make money
It is a lead-generation marketplace: home-services contractors pay HomeAdvisor a membership fee plus a per-lead fee for every homeowner inquiry it forwards to them, whether or not the pro wins the job.
What they do
It produces matches between homeowners and local service pros, displaying pro profiles with star ratings, customer reviews, and badges like "Elite Service Pro" alongside the contractors who have paid to receive leads in that area.
What to watch for
The pros you see are paying advertisers, not editorially vetted "best" picks, and your contact details are typically sold to several competing contractors at once, so being matched here is no guarantee of quality and you should expect multiple sales calls.
Composite score
1.30 / 5.00 → grade D

How the grade was reached

Independence · 30% weight 0 / 5

Does the site take money from the very entities it ranks? Pay-for-placement, vendor-funded data, and affiliate commissions all pull this down. The less the ranking can be bought, the higher the score.

Evidence basis · 30% weight 2 / 5

What is the ranking actually built on? Hands-on testing scores highest, then verified first-hand reviews, then opinion or popularity surveys and self-reported figures, then pay-to-rank, which scores lowest.

Method transparency · 20% weight 2 / 5

Is the methodology published, specific, and reproducible? Can a reader see how a given rank was reached, or is it a black box?

Conflict disclosure · 10% weight 1 / 5

Are commercial relationships, sponsorships, and affiliate arrangements disclosed clearly and near the rankings themselves, rather than buried?

Manipulation resistance · 10% weight 2 / 5

How hard is it to game? Controls against fake reviews, solicited reviews, and vendor gaming raise this; an open box anyone can stuff lowers it.

Evidence

Compare with others

Others reviewing local & home services (compare all →)

← Back to the Report Card