Plumb
C+

Local home services reviews & lead marketplace

Angi

Angi Inc. (majority-controlled by IAC Inc.)

Directory / lead-gen Free to read Visit Angi ↗

A lead-gen marketplace in a review site's clothes: the pros up top paid to be there.

What it's really for A home-services lead marketplace; the pros up top generally paid for placement rather than earning it.

What our grade covers The grade on this page is about its contractor ratings and rankings, not everything the site does.

High Scoring Confidence Checked against primary sources. We are confident in the facts and the grade here.

Follow the money

Angi's own FAQ confirms paying advertisers ("Angi Approved" pros) are "listed above other service providers" in search results while a majority of Angi's revenue comes from the Ads and Leads segment funded by the very pros being listed, so paying directly buys higher placement.

Source →
Operating since
1995 (31 years) · source
What it costs you
Free to read The reviews are free to read.
How they make money
Angi makes money mainly through its Ads and Leads segment, charging local service professionals for advertising contracts and per-match "consumer connection" (pay-per-lead) fees, plus membership subscriptions.
What they do
It runs a home-services marketplace that pairs verified customer star-ratings and reviews of contractors with a paid search/lead system that connects homeowners to local pros.
What to watch for
The contractors shown at the top of your search results are largely there because they paid to advertise, not because they are the highest-rated, so top placement does not mean best pro.
Composite score
2.60 / 5.00 → grade C+

How the grade was reached

Independence · 30% weight 1 / 5

Does the site take money from the very entities it ranks? Pay-for-placement, vendor-funded data, and affiliate commissions all pull this down. The less the ranking can be bought, the higher the score.

Evidence basis · 30% weight 4 / 5

What is the ranking actually built on? Hands-on testing scores highest, then verified first-hand reviews, then opinion or popularity surveys and self-reported figures, then pay-to-rank, which scores lowest.

Method transparency · 20% weight 3 / 5

Is the methodology published, specific, and reproducible? Can a reader see how a given rank was reached, or is it a black box?

Conflict disclosure · 10% weight 2 / 5

Are commercial relationships, sponsorships, and affiliate arrangements disclosed clearly and near the rankings themselves, rather than buried?

Manipulation resistance · 10% weight 3 / 5

How hard is it to game? Controls against fake reviews, solicited reviews, and vendor gaming raise this; an open box anyone can stuff lowers it.

Evidence

Compare with others

Others reviewing local & home services (compare all →)

← Back to the Report Card