Plumb
C

employer-jobs

Indeed

Recruit Holdings

Crowd reviews Free to read Visit Indeed ↗

A jobs giant where companies are ranked partly by what they pay: employers buy higher placement for listings, while company "reviews" come from anyone who claims they worked there.

What it's really for A job-search aggregator with employee company reviews; free to seekers, employers pay to post.

What our grade covers The grade on this page is about its employee company ratings, not everything the site does.

High Scoring Confidence Checked against primary sources. We are confident in the facts and the grade here.

Follow the money

Employers pay the most: they fund Sponsored Jobs on a pay-per-click or pay-per-application basis, and Indeed states paid jobs "are prioritized in relevant search results" and retain that increased visibility for as long as they're sponsored, so paying does buy higher job-listing placement.

Source →
Operating since
2004 (22 years) · source
What it costs you
Free to read The reviews are free to read.
How they make money
A job-search aggregator and employer-review platform where job seekers browse listings and rate companies for free, and employers pay to sponsor and prioritize their job postings.
What they do
Indeed aggregates job listings from across the web and hosts employee-submitted company ratings and reviews, letting job seekers search and apply for free.
What to watch for
The catch: by Indeed's own documentation, sponsored job posts are prioritized for more visibility in search results, and company reviews come from self-attested current or former employees whose employment Indeed does not fully verify.
Composite score
2.40 / 5.00 → grade C

How the grade was reached

Independence · 30% weight 2 / 5

Does the site take money from the very entities it ranks? Pay-for-placement, vendor-funded data, and affiliate commissions all pull this down. The less the ranking can be bought, the higher the score.

Evidence basis · 30% weight 3 / 5

What is the ranking actually built on? Hands-on testing scores highest, then verified first-hand reviews, then opinion or popularity surveys and self-reported figures, then pay-to-rank, which scores lowest.

Method transparency · 20% weight 2 / 5

Is the methodology published, specific, and reproducible? Can a reader see how a given rank was reached, or is it a black box?

Conflict disclosure · 10% weight 3 / 5

Are commercial relationships, sponsorships, and affiliate arrangements disclosed clearly and near the rankings themselves, rather than buried?

Manipulation resistance · 10% weight 2 / 5

How hard is it to game? Controls against fake reviews, solicited reviews, and vendor gaming raise this; an open box anyone can stuff lowers it.

Evidence

Compare with others

Others reviewing employers & jobs (compare all →)

← Back to the Report Card