Plumb
D+

travel-hospitality

Skytrax

Independent (privately held UK company; no parent owner)

Ratings & rankings Free to read Visit Skytrax ↗

The self-styled "Oscars of aviation" runs free passenger-voted awards alongside a paid audit/certification arm, and critics say earning money from the airlines it rates clouds its independence.

What it's really for An aviation-rating firm; airlines reportedly pay for the audits behind the star ratings.

What our grade covers The grade on this page is about its airline and airport star ratings and awards, not everything the site does.

High Scoring Confidence Checked against primary sources. We are confident in the facts and the grade here.

Follow the money

Skytrax says it funds the passenger awards survey itself and gives award logos away free, but a separate revenue stream comes from airlines and airports paying for Skytrax "audits" tied to the official Star Rating; Lufthansa confirmed paying low five-figure euro sums for audits, and reporting argues the firm makes most of its money from the very airlines it rates, which critics call an inherent conflict of interest even though carriers cannot openly buy a higher score.

Source →
Operating since
1989 (37 years) · source
What it costs you
Free to read The reviews are free to read.
How they make money
London-based aviation research firm that ranks airlines and airports through passenger surveys and its own auditor inspections, awarding 1-to-5-star ratings and the annual World Airline/Airport Awards while separately selling carriers paid audits and consulting.
What they do
Publishes star ratings and "World Airline Awards" for airlines and airports, blending worldwide passenger satisfaction surveys with hands-on inspections by its own researchers.
What to watch for
The headline-grabbing awards are free to enter, but the official Star Rating comes from paid audits whose detailed scoring criteria Skytrax does not publish, and the airlines it rates are by its own model also its paying audit/consulting clients.
Composite score
1.80 / 5.00 → grade D+

How the grade was reached

Independence · 30% weight 1 / 5

Does the site take money from the very entities it ranks? Pay-for-placement, vendor-funded data, and affiliate commissions all pull this down. The less the ranking can be bought, the higher the score.

Evidence basis · 30% weight 3 / 5

What is the ranking actually built on? Hands-on testing scores highest, then verified first-hand reviews, then opinion or popularity surveys and self-reported figures, then pay-to-rank, which scores lowest.

Method transparency · 20% weight 2 / 5

Is the methodology published, specific, and reproducible? Can a reader see how a given rank was reached, or is it a black box?

Conflict disclosure · 10% weight 1 / 5

Are commercial relationships, sponsorships, and affiliate arrangements disclosed clearly and near the rankings themselves, rather than buried?

Manipulation resistance · 10% weight 1 / 5

How hard is it to game? Controls against fake reviews, solicited reviews, and vendor gaming raise this; an open box anyone can stuff lowers it.

Evidence

Compare with others

Others reviewing travel & hospitality (compare all →)

← Back to the Report Card