Plumb
C

Home Gym Equipment Reviews

Set For Set

Set For Set (independent; co-founded by Sam and Kiel)

Editorial reviews Free to read Visit Set For Set ↗

Set For Set produces credentialed, fitness-expert-authored equipment content and discloses its affiliate and free-product arrangements, but publishes no auditable ranking methodology and earns commissions from every major affiliate network covering the products it ranks, which structurally compromises independence regardless of the stated intent to stay unbiased.

What it's really for Content marketing hub that drives affiliate revenue by ranking and recommending fitness equipment to home gym buyers.

What our grade covers The grade on this page is about Home gym and strength training equipment: power racks, dumbbells, kettlebells, barbells, treadmills, and related gear., not everything the site does.

Medium Scoring Confidence Mostly sourced, but a detail or two still needs a primary source, so the grade could shift slightly.

Follow the money

Set For Set's disclosures page states it participates in affiliate programs including Amazon, ShareASale, Avant Link, Impact, CJ, Refersion, and Fanfuel, earning commissions on purchases made through product links. It also accepts free products for review and runs sponsored content. All three revenue streams tie financially to the same product makers and retailers being ranked.

Source →
Operating since
2018 (8 years) · source
What it costs you
Free to read The reviews are free to read.
How they make money
Affiliate commissions (Amazon and multiple networks), sponsored content, and direct sales of branded workout programs and supplements.
What they do
Staff fitness experts and certified trainers write equipment reviews and ranked "best of" lists for home gym gear including power racks, dumbbells, kettlebells, treadmills, and barbells, alongside workout programs and nutrition content.
What to watch for
The methodology for how products are scored and ranked is not published in a specific, reproducible form. The site discloses that it receives free products from vendors and earns affiliate commissions on purchases, but provides no auditable controls explaining how those relationships are kept from influencing final rankings.
Composite score
2.40 / 5.00 → grade C

How the grade was reached

Independence · 30% weight 2 / 5

Does the site take money from the very entities it ranks? Pay-for-placement, vendor-funded data, and affiliate commissions all pull this down. The less the ranking can be bought, the higher the score.

Evidence basis · 30% weight 3 / 5

What is the ranking actually built on? Hands-on testing scores highest, then verified first-hand reviews, then opinion or popularity surveys and self-reported figures, then pay-to-rank, which scores lowest.

Method transparency · 20% weight 2 / 5

Is the methodology published, specific, and reproducible? Can a reader see how a given rank was reached, or is it a black box?

Conflict disclosure · 10% weight 3 / 5

Are commercial relationships, sponsorships, and affiliate arrangements disclosed clearly and near the rankings themselves, rather than buried?

Manipulation resistance · 10% weight 2 / 5

How hard is it to game? Controls against fake reviews, solicited reviews, and vendor gaming raise this; an open box anyone can stuff lowers it.

Evidence

Compare with others

Others reviewing fitness & gear (compare all →)

← Back to the Report Card