Plumb
C-

Real estate listings & agent directory

Realtor.com

Move, Inc. (owned by News Corp; licensed by the National Association of Realtors)

Marketplace Free to read Visit Realtor.com ↗

A News Corp listings portal whose agent "Find a Realtor" directory mixes verified client reviews with paid placement, so prominence partly reflects ad spend, not merit.

What it's really for A national home-listings site; the agent directory is monetized by leads and promoted placement.

What our grade covers The grade on this page is about its agent directory ratings and reviews, not everything the site does.

High Scoring Confidence Checked against primary sources. We are confident in the facts and the grade here.

Follow the money

Real estate agents and brokers pay the most, through lead subscriptions (e.g., Connections Plus from roughly $200/mo to $1,000+/mo by ZIP) and enhanced profiles, and that spend buys larger, higher-placed visibility in agent search.

Source →
Operating since
1996 (30 years) · source
What it costs you
Free to read The reviews are free to read.
How they make money
It makes money by selling leads, referral fees, and advertising (enhanced agent profiles and promoted placement) to real estate agents and brokers.
What they do
Realtor.com runs a national home-listings site plus an agent directory where consumers can browse agent profiles, star ratings, and client reviews.
What to watch for
Top agent visibility is a paid ad product, not an earned ranking: by the platform's own design, enhanced "Local Expert" profiles get larger, higher-placed listings, so the order you see partly reflects who paid.
Composite score
2.10 / 5.00 → grade C-

How the grade was reached

Independence · 30% weight 1 / 5

Does the site take money from the very entities it ranks? Pay-for-placement, vendor-funded data, and affiliate commissions all pull this down. The less the ranking can be bought, the higher the score.

Evidence basis · 30% weight 3 / 5

What is the ranking actually built on? Hands-on testing scores highest, then verified first-hand reviews, then opinion or popularity surveys and self-reported figures, then pay-to-rank, which scores lowest.

Method transparency · 20% weight 2 / 5

Is the methodology published, specific, and reproducible? Can a reader see how a given rank was reached, or is it a black box?

Conflict disclosure · 10% weight 2 / 5

Are commercial relationships, sponsorships, and affiliate arrangements disclosed clearly and near the rankings themselves, rather than buried?

Manipulation resistance · 10% weight 3 / 5

How hard is it to game? Controls against fake reviews, solicited reviews, and vendor gaming raise this; an open box anyone can stuff lowers it.

Evidence

Compare with others

Others reviewing real estate (compare all →)

← Back to the Report Card